"Under its (democracy ed) remains ideological camouflaging nest can be easily ,[...] even smaller and less presentable oligarchic rule. The democratic forms of power can be an effective mask to conceal .[...] It tells us that democracy, as the word It can contain the anti-democracy, as a substance. Indeed, today's power needs to go through the door assured of democracy. "
Where does the degeneration of democracy into oligarchy? Even the words of Zagrebelsky:
[...] we must acknowledge that democracy must always reckon with his natural tendency to the reduction of power in few hands, the hands of elites . [...] [...] The studies have different variants and the conclusions I reach are not necessarily in opposition to the minimum requirements of democracy. But things change when you switch from elites oligarchies to [...]. [...] The oligarchy is the 'elite that becomes the body separate and expropriate large numbers to their advantage . "
After this analysis, the lawyer gives Piedmont, almost as a consequence, a definition of" democracy "in negative
«[...] democracy is not - in the sense that can not be - self-government of the people who said long-term. E 'for the possibility institutionalized, then made permanent in accordance with procedures approved and accepted, to fight and destroy the oligarchs and over again that it feeds on itself within itself. "
a realistic and disillusioned with democracy which cling.
0 comments:
Post a Comment